{"id":32615,"date":"2019-02-10T22:36:32","date_gmt":"2019-02-10T22:36:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615"},"modified":"2019-02-11T01:57:47","modified_gmt":"2019-02-11T01:57:47","slug":"the-stance-change-bidisha-bhattacharya","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615","title":{"rendered":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The decision taken by the Central Bank on Thursday, 7th of February not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non. While Headline Inflation, led by Food Inflation has been in the safe zone, continuing high levels of core inflation had led to the expectation that the RBI might stop short of cutting rates and restrict itself to a change in the stance of the economy. The rate cut, therefore, took us a bit by surprise.<br \/>\nFor all those arguing over the impact of this rate cut more on production or inflation, a slight reality check. Historically, it has always been observed that Central Bank policy actions have had a much more immediate impact on Inflation than on Production: let\u2019s understand WHY?<br \/>\nTo begin with, let us recall a very important factor and keep that in mind as we proceed along the logic: while lending rate cuts depend on the efficiency of the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism, there is another area where monetary policy has a quick impact- THE MONEY SUPPLY.<br \/>\nWhen the Central Bank (in our case, RBI), reduces policy rates, the first thing Commercial Banks (like SBI, ICICI etc) do is reduce their interest rates on deposits. REASON? Interests paid on deposits are their cost and they would be too glad to reduce it whenever the opportunity knocks.<br \/>\nOnce the interest rates on the deposits reduce, people will be less inclined to keep their money in deposits as rates of return are now lower. Hence the additional money that they will be keeping for themselves will transform into nothing else but increased Consumption in the short-run. This will increase Demand. Now, increasing supply of consumption goods is hardly possible in the short-run which increases the prices of the commodities and thereby steps in the Elephant in the Room-INFLATION.<br \/>\nWhile it did seem a welcoming move for providing a bigger push forward to the demand side of Real estate and making loans cheaper, the policy move did seem a bit premature. Here\u2019s why<br \/>\nIndeed inflation is unlikely to hit 4% anytime soon, but as per the current economic scenario, the underlying pressure still remains upward. On one hand, while high core inflation, running at about 6% in the current financial year clearly reflects elevated inflation expectations, loose fiscal policy and a weak currency step in as other factors likely to push prices up going forward.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-32616 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Untitled.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"763\" height=\"341\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Untitled.png 763w, https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Untitled-300x134.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 763px) 100vw, 763px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Source: Bloomberg estimates<br \/>\nTo add on to this, government bonds gained and the Indian rupee weakened in a knee-jerk reaction to the RBI\u2019s decision.<br \/>\nBonds might not be able to provide relief for long as the persisting wide fiscal deficit would continue to pressure yields higher. The INR7.04 trillion government borrowing plan for FY2020 announced in the budget a week ago represents an over 30% increase from the revised INR 5.35 trillion borrowing in the current year. This will not only put pressure on the borrowing costs but would also cause a significant crowding out of private investment, thereby weighing on GDP growth.<br \/>\nThe answer to the question we need to look out for presently is why did we need a loose monetary policy when the fiscal policy was already supporting growth well above 7%?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The decision taken by the Central Bank on Thursday, 7th of February not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":32617,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5,3],"tags":[97,96,49],"class_list":["post-32615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-finance","category-indian-economy","tag-monetary-policy","tag-rate-cut","tag-rbi"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Public Economist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePublicEconomist\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/secureservercdn.net\/160.153.138.71\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg?time=1635872114\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"621\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"414\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bidisha Bhattacharya\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@EconomistPublic\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@EconomistPublic\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bidisha Bhattacharya\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bidisha Bhattacharya\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/06ddbae8a409a292624afd9e5ff0d9f9\"},\"headline\":\"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615\"},\"wordCount\":569,\"commentCount\":2,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Monetary Policy\",\"Rate Cut\",\"RBI\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Finance\",\"Indian Economy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615\",\"name\":\"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00\",\"description\":\"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg\",\"width\":621,\"height\":414,\"caption\":\"Reserve Bank of India\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?p=32615#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Public Economist\",\"description\":\"The Policy Monitor\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Public Economist\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secureservercdn.net\\\/160.153.138.71\\\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/log.png?time=1618112527\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secureservercdn.net\\\/160.153.138.71\\\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/log.png?time=1618112527\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"The Public Economist\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ThePublicEconomist\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/EconomistPublic\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/the-public-economist\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCzP8-NRgwG9noDdmVq34ddg\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/06ddbae8a409a292624afd9e5ff0d9f9\",\"name\":\"Bidisha Bhattacharya\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bidisha Bhattacharya\"},\"description\":\"Bidisha Bhattacharya works ScrollStack. Prior to this she was a Consultant to the Fifteenth Finance Commission, Government of India and has worked as a Political Researcher in Prashant Kishor\u2019s Strategic Research and Insights (SRI) team at I-PAC.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/thepubliceconomist.com\\\/?author=23\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist","description":"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist","og_description":"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.","og_url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615","og_site_name":"The Public Economist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePublicEconomist\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":621,"height":414,"url":"https:\/\/secureservercdn.net\/160.153.138.71\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg?time=1635872114","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bidisha Bhattacharya","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@EconomistPublic","twitter_site":"@EconomistPublic","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bidisha Bhattacharya","Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615"},"author":{"name":"Bidisha Bhattacharya","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#\/schema\/person\/06ddbae8a409a292624afd9e5ff0d9f9"},"headline":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya","datePublished":"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615"},"wordCount":569,"commentCount":2,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg","keywords":["Monetary Policy","Rate Cut","RBI"],"articleSection":["Finance","Indian Economy"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615","url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615","name":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya - The Public Economist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg","datePublished":"2019-02-10T22:36:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-11T01:57:47+00:00","description":"The decision taken by the RBI on Thursday, 7th of February to cut rate, not only did surprise economists but market watchers as well. Whereas the unanimous decision of changing the monetary policy stance from \u2018calibrated tightening\u2019 to \u2018neutral\u2019 seemed plausible, the cutting of the repurchase rate by 25 basis points didn\u2019t quite seem a sine qua non.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/RBI_SLR-kqdH-621x414@LiveMint.jpg","width":621,"height":414,"caption":"Reserve Bank of India"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?p=32615#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The \u201cSTANCE\u201d change -Bidisha Bhattacharya"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/","name":"The Public Economist","description":"The Policy Monitor","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#organization","name":"The Public Economist","url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secureservercdn.net\/160.153.138.71\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/log.png?time=1618112527","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secureservercdn.net\/160.153.138.71\/73a.736.myftpupload.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/log.png?time=1618112527","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"The Public Economist"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePublicEconomist\/","https:\/\/x.com\/EconomistPublic","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/the-public-economist\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCzP8-NRgwG9noDdmVq34ddg"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/#\/schema\/person\/06ddbae8a409a292624afd9e5ff0d9f9","name":"Bidisha Bhattacharya","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea277761e50d06713b72118250845f2c8a89ab05fc8194c02a5463928460d703?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bidisha Bhattacharya"},"description":"Bidisha Bhattacharya works ScrollStack. Prior to this she was a Consultant to the Fifteenth Finance Commission, Government of India and has worked as a Political Researcher in Prashant Kishor\u2019s Strategic Research and Insights (SRI) team at I-PAC.","url":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/?author=23"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32615"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32615\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32657,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32615\/revisions\/32657"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/32617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thepubliceconomist.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}